Search for: "Toys-R-Us, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 279
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2017, 7:12 am by John H Curley
Toys 'R' Us, Inc, a case interpreting the NJ Law Against Discrimination, and found that the evidence did not support a finding of a hostile work environment. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:17 am by Eric Caligiuri
  Four months after lawyers with Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP (“Gordon & Rees”) began representation of Lanard Toys Limited (“Lanard”) against ToysRUs-Delaware, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:16 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
& Appeals of City of N.Y., 91 NY2d 413, 419-420; see Matter of Toys R Us v Silva, 89 NY2d 411, 419; Matter of Teachers Ins. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:16 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
& Appeals of City of N.Y., 91 NY2d 413, 419-420; see Matter of Toys R Us v Silva, 89 NY2d 411, 419; Matter of Teachers Ins. [read post]
Some of the online retailers to have been sued include Victoria’s Secret, Bed Bath & Beyond and TOYSRUS, with more suits being filed every day. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Lexmark International, Inc., No. 15-1189 (unreasonable restraints on downstream uses) Obviousness: Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am by David Fraser
Once I have established that the use of personal information was for journalistic pu [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:12 pm by Richard Hunt
The pre-litigation letter placed Harbor Freight on notice that its website was allegedly non-ADA complaint for blind and visually impaired individuals, and Attorney Hurley upon receipt of this letter, instead of assisting his client, Harbor Freight, by speedily and inexpensively achieving the same result he obtained through court-ordered mediation for his ToysR Us client, opted to initiate another federal lawsuit in a different District, inflicting substantial… [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
Of course, we’ve also had that other elf leave us to join the toy company in you-know-where. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
Regarding the C&J case, the thrust of the Supreme Court decision, which relied in part on the Chancery decision in Toys R Us, focused on the reality that stockholders are in the best position to decide whether to vote in favor of–or to reject a deal, and it acknowledges the sophistication of most investors today, as well as honoring the rights of the acquirer. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
In 2014, she obtained a Judgment from the Supreme Court dismissing 93 DACO penalties issued to Toys R Us. [read post]