Search for: "Treat v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 23,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Trevizo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:14 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:30 am
After the verdict came in late yesterday in the Kodrin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:33 am
I haven’t followed the details of this controversy, but as a general matter the NCAA is not treated as a state actor, even though it has many state universities as members (though the answer may be different as to other organizations that are more dominated by public institutions, especially public institutions operated by the same state, see Brentwood Academy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 7:37 am
The leading case in this scenario is Cobb v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:25 pm
In today’s case (Deiter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm
United States (1968) and essentially nullified Gray v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
The Supreme Court will hear the appeal in R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department on 25 and 26 July 2016, where it will be asked to consider a challenge to a deportation order, on the grounds that the appellant ought to have been entitled to automatic British citizenship at birth, and as such should not be deported to Jamaica. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:56 pm
CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:26 am
Nnyanzi v United Kingdom (Application No 21878/06) European Court of Human Rights “There was no reason to belive that an applicant who unsuccessfully sought asylum, on the basis of her father's political activities in Uganda, would be ill treated on her expulsion to that state. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 6:58 am
The post ALLIED PROPANE, ET AL. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
Tamraz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
It is well established in our precedent that a suit against an arm or instrumentality of the State is treated as one against the State itself. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The judgment in NS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] QB 102 did refer to a systemic breach but the CJEU’s focus was on Member States’ awareness of such a breach, rather than the type of breach. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:06 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 28 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (George) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 28 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 7:37 am
Duchimaza v. [read post]
