Search for: "Tucker v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:32 am by Dan Flynn
The United States v Miller’s Organic Farm and Amos Miller’s next such hearing will be on September 26 At this one, Amos Miller of Bird-in-Hand, PA must have his $305,000 fine paid up or he risks going to jail. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
About a century ago, Benito Mussolini called fascist Italy a “totalitarian state,” a concept that he defined with brilliant clarity: “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
If it becomes clear that sanctions will not induce compliance, they must cease (although “civil” confinement for disobedience of a state court’s order once lasted 14 years). [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am by ernst
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The remarkable record of this history of emergencies and law from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries is captured in detail within, for example, the essays collected in the Canadian State Trials series edited by Barry Wright, Susan Binnie and Eric Tucker. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 1:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In a personal injury case involving a plaintiff slipping and falling on subway stairs, the court considered whether the defendant, New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA), had a reasonable opportunity after the end of a snow storm to address the slippery condition, or whether NYCTA had actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition. [read post]