Search for: "U. S. v. Arthur"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
U. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:18 am
(Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Some History: Once upon a time Access Copyright was known as CanCopy – until I and others inspired by former York University President Harry Arthurs - nicknamed it “Can’t Copy” – which was much more accurate. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
.-- James Arthur David Hope (above right), the member of the British House of Lords who goes by the nom de juge of Lord Hope of Craighead, writing last Wednesday in RB (Algeria) (FC) v Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't.In the end, the Law Lords ruled in favor of the British government in this "case involving the proposed deportation of two Algerians, identified only as 'RB' and 'U', who the Home Secretary considers are a threat to… [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm
” (Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
Both of these adjustments are based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) published by the United States Department of Labor. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
(Citing Save Berkeley’s Neighborhoods v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
LEXIS 3929 | 2013 NY Slip Op 32056(U), New York County Supreme Court Justice Arthur F. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
U. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Casto’s article: “Dear Sister Antillico…” The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:45 am
It happened to be the lower court’s ruling in Shapiro v Ettison, 2015 NY Slip Op 31670 [U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015]. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 9:36 am
Russell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm
(quoting Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
(citing and quoting Soldo v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
While Public Resources Code § 21061 – a general definitional statute not cited by OPR in support of its proposal – defines an EIR as “a detailed statement setting forth the matters specified in Sections 21100 and 21100.1[,]” this general reference is of unclear import and per CEQA’s own terms governs “[u]nless the context otherwise requires. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:41 am
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]