Search for: "U. S. v. Sellers"
Results 61 - 80
of 240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2020, 4:29 am
Here, in Sutherland v Fitzpatrick 2020 NY Slip Op 30029(U) January 2, 2020 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 2090/2018 Judge: Lara J. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 3:22 am
” Illinois Court Finds Ongoing Fiduciary Duty in Decision Reviving Minority Shareholder’s Suit to Invalidate Settlement Agreement Notwithstanding Release and Non-Reliance Provision Arndt v Nardulli, 2018 IL App (1st) 173044-U [Ill. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
Mazal Manager, LLC v Herrick Feinstein LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 32305(U) July 29, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158840/2018 Judge: O. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
” Berni v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
Relators alleged that the state could impose its taxing jurisdiction on remote sellers based on the attributional nexus theory. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
” The Restatement’s articulated standard does not call for the seller’s subjective awareness as a necessary condition. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am
Muco v Sadiku 2019 NY Slip Op 50709(U) Decided on May 9, 2019 Supreme Court, Queens County Butler, J is the story of the two purchasers suing each other and every one else too. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:28 am
LEXIS 3075, 2017 NY Slip Op 31699(U), ¶ 12 (Sup. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am
In Garber v Stevens, Mem. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:08 am
Schechter’s recent decision in Favourite Ltd. v Cico, 2018 NY Slip Op 32781(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 30, 2018], permitting the LLC and some of its members to file an amended pleading against the LLC’s former managing members, addresses several issues of interest including whether the legislature’s action automatically triggered dissolution under the operating agreement’s arguably conflicting… [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
While Illinois doesn’t quite go as far as the “Nordic” model in that sex work is not legal for sellers or buyers, it does seek to lessen the consequences faced by sellers who are more often perceived as victims while simultaneously increasing the consequences for buyers who are more often perceived as facilitators or predators. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:50 am
Gorelick, General Counsel, U. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm
The Aftermath of South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm
The court also held that the law, which limited itself to ads for handguns, and only those that were on store premises, was unconstitutionally underinclusive: "[U]nderinclusivity is relevant to Central Hudson's direct advancement prong because it 'may diminish the credibility of the government's rationale for restricting speech in the first place.'" For example, in Pitt News v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
“The Court may consider the company’s past performance as well as future events that are ‘known or susceptible of proof’ as of the valuation date” (Ferolito v AriZona Beverages USA LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 32830(U) [Sup Ct, Nassau County Oct. 14, 2014]). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:18 am
In its 5-4 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Animal Science Products, Inc v Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co, 585 U. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:51 am
” In the Penn Program on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Michael Knoll suggests that the court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
