Search for: "U.S. v. Cruz"
Results 61 - 80
of 505
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2022, 3:05 pm
And Justice Thomas's dissent in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 10:11 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Baze v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
The Cruz decision, like the Supreme Judicial Court's decision in U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:32 am
Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396 (1989); Wilkinson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:28 am
Shuck, 2012 U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:15 am
The judge in U.S. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
Inner City Press reports on a sentencing decision handed down yesterday in a New York federal district court in U.S. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:24 pm
Cruz’s legal team is led by Shanta Driver of Michigan-based By Any Means Necessary, a coalition that agitated in support of affirmative action in Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
(Cruz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 10:58 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
Cruz, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:50 am
Evidence Voice identification; foundation Where a police officer had listened to a 15-second voice exemplar, it was not error to admit his identification of recorded conversation as the defendant's voice. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:51 pm
Judge Reinhardt -- like the district court -- holds that just because you consent to have someone "search" your phone doesn't mean they're allowed to answer incoming calls and pretend to be you. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:15 am
I like how Judge Reinhardt begins this one: "At first glance, there appears to be something odd about a court of law in a diverse nation such as ours deciding whether a specific individual is or is not 'an Indian.'" Because he's right that I wouldn't ordinarily have thought that criminal liability turns upon this issue. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 1:18 pm
ShareOn Tuesday, in Cruz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Cruz-Guzman, 2009 U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]