Search for: "U.S. v. Black (f. Martin)" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
Martin, 378 F.3d 353, 357 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1029 (2004). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Women could vote in New Jersey and free Blacks voted on the same basis as Whites in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, and probably in Connecticut and Maryland was well.[5]  In the fall of 1788, the eleven ratifying states elected Representative and Senators, and voted for the new president. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 “Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4]  The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 “Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4]  The U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm by Adam Feldman
Paradise, which upheld against an equal protection clause challenge a state scheme that required the promotion of one black employee for every white employee. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
“First, Greene contends that the prosecution exercised peremptory challenges against six black members of the jury venire on the basis of race in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Batson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Louisiana, No. 06-10119 A Louisiana conviction for first-degree murder and death sentence is reversed where the trial judge committed clear error in its ruling on an objection to the prosecution's strike of a black juror during voir dire, in violation of Batson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Data Protection in Canada, in Dubois, E. and Martin-Bariteau, F. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]