Search for: "U.S. v. Clay"
Results 61 - 80
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2009, 12:48 pm
In January 2008, a divided panel of the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:59 am
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.html One petition for certiorari was denied this week on 10/12/21: Clay v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
LEXIS 118059, July 30, 2013) and dismissed without prejudice an inmate's complaint that his 1st Amendment rights were infringed when authorities confiscated a manuscript he was writing regarding The Nation of Gods and Earths inmates.In Clay v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 7:18 pm
Clay, 376 F.3d at 1302. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:10 am
In Rainer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 12:41 pm
Sanofi, 598 U.S. 594 (2023) and was struck by the Supreme Court’s statement that its 19th Century decision of Wood v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 8:00 pm
Sherry, a divided panel of the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:38 am
Chronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), five-factor framework for ineffectiveness. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:53 pm
This is a reminder that while Baze v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 6:10 pm
Gerber v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in in 1960 in Clay v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:18 pm
Failure to comply with the settlement terms could cost Hobby Lobby $2,000 per day.The forfeiture complaint—docketed in the Eastern District of New York as United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
Friday, June 6 WHERE: U.S District Court Northern District of California Courtroom 5, Second Floor 1301 Clay Street Oakland, CA For the full order from Judge White:https://www.eff.org/document/order-setting-hearing-0 For more on Jewel v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:59 pm
”What:Hearing in Jewel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:27 am
Clay dissented. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), undermine the Supreme Court's ruling in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
Grant, No. 07–3831, 2009 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 3:19 pm
The parallel U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 1:48 pm
The opinion notes that "[t]his particular case is not close," and recommends "that the U.S. [read post]
