Search for: "URBAN v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 89
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by froomkin@law.tm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 1:32 am
Kalish, 103367/05 Supreme Court, New York County: Part 35Government NYPD Ordered to Disclose Documents Related to Arrests at S&M Clubs, But Not Internal Manual Urban Justice Center v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of relevance to a recent trade secret case, captioned Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm by WIMS
The district court in this case refused to approve a proposed settlement of a Clean Water Act suit brought by the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky against the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 12:15 pm
Murphy Oil USA, et al., 585 F.3d 855 (5th Cir. 2009). [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:34 am
State Street Corporation (PDF 4.5 MB)Lawsuit Alleges Fraud Against Two California State Pension Funds10/20/2009 Criminal Complaint in the Matter of U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:47 am
[Chris Fountain, For What It's Worth] “Religious group sued for allegedly inciting harm through prayers” [USA Today] Legally driven waste of water in parched California should reopen Endangered Species Act debate [Max Schulz, American Spectator] “More Unintended Consequences — Endangered Species Edition” [Ronald Bailey, Reason; related AEI panel] “Apple v Woolworth re Apple Logos In Australia” [Trademark… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
This is because it does not mention or appear to even take into account the landmark 2004 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH v. [read post]