Search for: "US INVENTOR, INC. v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE" Results 61 - 80 of 210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
  The changes further made the novelty defeating acts available wherever they occur in the world, thereby removing requirements related to occurrences in the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Transamerica Life Insurance Co (Patently-O) CAFC: Employee and officer liability for inducing infringement: Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
Transamerica Life Insurance Co (Patently-O) CAFC: Employee and officer liability for inducing infringement: Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:23 pm by Gene Quinn
This trend was halted by the United States Supreme Court in the summer of 2002 in Holmes Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable… [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 11:30 am by Kirk M. Hartung
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), inventors, businesses, and other patent stakeholders, in applying the Supreme Court’s precedents consistently with regard to patent eligibility under Section 101. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post-Grant) New Mexico politicians lobby for satellite patent office (IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Bosch v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Not to be taken lightly (Class 99) British government clowning around with patents – but noone’s laughing - ‘New 10% tax on income from patents to boost science development’ (IPKat) (IAM) It’s certainly not contaminated by cheese: Illegal to make Stilton cheese in Stilton (Trademark Blog)   United States US General US Government Accountability Office reviews US overseas IP Attaches (IP… [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:27 am by The Dear Rich Staff
At the time Nolo was founded, if you had invented something but you weren’t ready to file a patent application, there was no effective, fast and cheap way to record your discovery at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99)   United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99)   United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
In July of 2006, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) established a trial program with the Japanese Patent Office, where an applicant with an allowed claim in one office could fast track the examination of a corresponding application filed in the other patent office. [read post]