Search for: "US v. Andrew Chance" Results 61 - 80 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung at Reuters. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:21 am by Amy Burns
The petitioner in this case, Charles Andrew Fowler, killed a local police officer who had discovered him while he was preparing to rob a bank. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
As a result of this victory, millions of New York residents will have a chance to breathe easier. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:10 am by Susan Brenner
According to the opinion, the case began when Kansas Trooper Andrew Dean . . . sat watching traffic along I–70. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 27 (2001) (Ginsburg, J.); and Justices Scalia and Thomas have criticized the expansive use of the discovery rule as a “bad wine of recent vintage,” id. at 37 (Scalia, J., concurring); Rotkiske v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 6:34 am by Mitu Gulati
They are amazing because they give us a sense of how his thinking evolved as his strategy moved from a hypothetical thought experiment that had no chance of being implemented to the one plausible strategy left on the table. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by INFORRM
In Parks v Hall & Anr [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB) Sir Andrew Nicol recently addressed the question of quite how much indulgence litigants-in-person should be afforded in libel claim before a case is struck out. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Rick Scott unlawfully used a super PAC to support his 2018 Senate run. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:04 pm
Andrew Bowler agreed, particularly if this could be agreed at an SSO level. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Tram in EdinburghThe IPKat is delighted to host the following guest post, drafted by Andrew McWhirter (Brodies Solicitors) concerning a recent Scottish trade secrets decision: Bilfinger v Edinburgh Tram Inquiry.Here’s what Andrew writes: “It is no secret (amongst local residents at least) that the publicly-funded Edinburgh tram project was seriously delayed, and cost almost double the original estimate at nearly £1 billion. [read post]