Search for: "US v. Bach"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2007, 5:04 am
Well done, Lawtel, for digging up this little gem from the Chancery Division, England and Wales, way back last April: it's a ruling by Mr Justice David Richards in Red Dot Technologies Ltd v Apollo Fire Detectors Ltd [2007] EWHC 1166 (Ch), not yet available on BAILII.This was an application by Red Dot for an interim injunction to stop Apollo publishing, distributing or using a chart it had produced for the purpose of comparative advertising. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 6:46 am
In 2005, the Second Circuit followed Presser and held in Bach v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:58 pm
In so holding, the Supreme Court expressly rejected the argument that its use of the phrase “manifest disregard of the law” in Wilko v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
As to the "meaning" of the sentence, that, as always, depends on the context in which it is being used. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
As to the "meaning" of the sentence, that, as always, depends on the context in which it is being used. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Note that the potential for the assertion of neighbouring rights to prevent de minimis uses and fair dealing with recorded music is another highly problematic feature of copyright law in the realm of music: see, for example, Bridgeport Music Inc v Dimension Films, 410 F 3d 792 (6th Cir 2005). 15 For a critique of copyright law’s vision of the author, originality, and cultural practices, see Carys J Craig, Copyright, Communication and Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:32 am
You can read the decision in Fisher v Brooker [2009] UKHL 41, in full and hot off the internet here and here.The Lord Law Lords (including one Legal Lady: Baroness Hale, who does remember the 1960s) have ruled that Fisher, who claimed he wrote the haunting pseudo-Bach organ melody which opened the song, is entitled to a share of future royalties. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Bach, 310 F.3d 1063 (8th Cir. 2002), which concerns the use of a search warrant to obtain records from an internet communication company. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
’” West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Clark v Jeter, 486 US 456, 461 (1988). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:21 am
Continuing the saga of Cautious v IPOff and the Case of the Robot Octopus, it awaits your pleasure here. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
Bach, 586 F.Supp.2d 1026, 1036 (N.D.Ill 2008); NCMIC Fin. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:01 am
Es por eso que en Eldred v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:22 am
Bache and Mr. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
The defence is discussed by Canadian lawyer Julian Falconer on this video US Law and Media News Once again, this will be the subject of a separate post. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
Illinois — as well as its own Circuit precedent reaching the same conclusion — Bach v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:41 am
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but a few resolved cases: Richard Jones v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Levy & McRae Solicitors, on behalf of Christopher and Mary Gorman v The Sun, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Mr Dean Torkington v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Dr Helen Hammond v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 22/03/2013; Basim Shamsuddin v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 19/03/2013; Noveprim Group… [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 3:37 pm
Many – including Justice Breyer in his dissent in Eldred v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 5:59 am
Bach. [read post]
