Search for: "US v. Mark Lambert"
Results 61 - 80
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 5:23 am
Lambert, 771 F.2d 83, 89 (6th Cir. 1985))). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Lego 3D manikin mark valid, says General CourtJeremy reports on Case T‑395/14 Best-Lock (Europe) Ltd v OHIM, Lego Juris A/S, a General Court of the European Union decision regarding the validity of a Lego Community trade mark that will be familiar to many readers who are children, have children or are movie buffs: the three-dimensional shape of a little Lego man.* Swiss cheese, Innocence and a question of guilt: Garcia v Google… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
”, Guest Kat Stephen Jones shares his insights on Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] – Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP |… [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
Simmons and Nancy Lambert. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
An even more hopeless attempt (in my view) was made to rely on Magical Marking Ltd v Holly [2008] EWHC (Ch) 2428 for assistance. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:32 am
Incidentally, the 81,423-wordjudgment does not contain the W word ...There has just fallen onto the desk of this Kat the judgment of Mr Justice Arnold at first instance following the full trial in the long-running case of Mylan and Actavis v Warner-Lambert. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 48 [week ending on Sunday 31 May] - The meaning of EPO appeal system | 3D Printing and the law | Epo and external investigation firms | Umbrella designs | US Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems | European Inventor Award | FIFA and brand integrity | Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Wine in Black GmbH v OHIM | IP and… [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
Nick Buckland (Irwin Mitchell) tells all.* Letter from AmeriKat: Remember fair use before issuing DMCA notices, warns Ninth CircuitAnnsley takes a gander at a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the famous case Prince and Mean Music Companies v That lovely baby dancing Prince Lenz v Universal Music.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that acquired distinctiveness requires that mark alone identifies… [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Lord Justice Arnold found that Warner-Lambert continues to apply in the UK and applies to both second medical use and single compounds claims. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
The Court relied on the test in Warner-Lambert Co v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm
The Court relied on the test in Warner-Lambert Co v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
Also, since questions 11 and 12 relate to matters of opinion, your answers will not count towards the total which will be marked out of 10. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
This Kat was reminded of the recusal situation in the patent action of Resolution v Lundbeck, where Mr Justice Arnold assured us that he was not swayed by his subconscious (see Katpost here).Nike and the Chuck Taylor sneaker: an epic billion dollar dispute (see Katpost here)Annabelle Gauberti spoke about how trade marks are being used in the US to protect the appearance of the Converse ‘Chuck Taylor’ sneaker. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 5:13 am
| IP: When innovation is the answer to a spiritual funkNever Too Late 63 [week ending on Sunday 13 September] - Fair compensation in reprography and private copying: the ECS’ version | Substitute sellers | Teva UK Ltd & Another v Leo Pharma | Evidence-based IP policy | KitKat case | UK IPO’s priorities | UK IPO’s website vs complete copyright legislation | Patent Attorney Qualifications | Mylan and Actavis v… [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for… [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” In an op-ed at TC Palm, Mark Miller weighs in on American Legion v. [read post]
7 Aug 2021, 7:50 am
Jim Langevin and Mark Montgomery discussed the potential of the Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:57 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews Iancu v. [read post]
