Search for: "USA v. Lord"
Results 61 - 80
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2008, 3:42 am
"Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform v Information Commissioner and Friends of the Earth (pdf) [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
In a rare radio interview this week the President of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, said that politicians were too slow to defend judges after November’s Brexit case. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:39 am
The third case, from Chicago, is SKF USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm
However, in the bedroom tax decision in R(MA and others) v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:43 pm
This volume explores the legal aspects of hashtags as trade marks in the EU, Germany, and the USA, and considered whether the law currently maintains the balance between freedom of expression and protection of competition. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Lord Neuberger gave the leading judgement, with LJs LLoyd and Gross concurring. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:25 am
Lord Neuberger gave the leading judgement, with LJs LLoyd and Gross concurring. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
The panel will take a critical look at recent cases which have acknowledged the advertising function, including L’Oreal v Bellure, Intel, Google France and L’Oreal v eBay, and will consider how much protection really is being afforded to the advertising function in Europe. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
Lord Mance gives the leading judgment of the Court. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
’” M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
In McTear v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
22 June 2011 (b) Who was the Lord Justice Lord Justice Leveson (c) What were the cases? [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
It is correct to say that deceptive similarity is a question for the tribunal of fact and is not a matter for any witness to decide but, as the passage cited by Gummow J from Lord Diplock’s judgment in General Electric Co (USA) v General Electric Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 729 at 738 makes plain, to say that a question is for the tribunal of fact or to describe it as a “jury question” does not mean that evidence going to that question is impermissible. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:19 am
Lord Justice Leveson has remained silent throughout the controversy that has raged since he delivered his report on the press in November 2012. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am
” This refers to the judgment of the House of Lords in the Naomi Campbell case. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
USA Today's Joan Biskupic has an extensive interview with Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
