Search for: "USA v. State of Ohio" Results 61 - 80 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the “decision to hear the case could signify that some of the Supreme Court’s more conservative justices believe Ohio and other states have a right to purge voters for not voting in several successive elections. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am by Rich McHugh
The challenge by retirees was rejected by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for failure to state a clam. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am by Rich McHugh
The challenge by retirees was rejected by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio for failure to state a clam. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by CJLF Staff
   In its 2014 ruling in Elonis v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Nov. 24, 2010) (same).A similar Ohio supplier’s statute precluded liability in King v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
    Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 08a0687n.06 USA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
The United States Supreme Court did not disturb the concept of General Jurisdiction in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am by Amy Howe
  At this blog, Lyle Denniston has the first of a four-part series previewing the oral arguments; the first post looks at the briefs filed by the same-sex couples in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee challenging those states’ laws. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 7:42 pm
  OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0144p.06 2007/04/23 USA v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
For the reasons stated below, we affirm the district court's orders. 08a0602n.06 USA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
For the reasons stated below, we reverse. 07a0245p.06 2007/06/26 USA v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:05 pm
For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part and reverse in part. 08a0380p.06 USA v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
University of Toledo    Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0289p.06 2008/08/12 USA v. [read post]