Search for: "Ulrich v. Ulrich" Results 61 - 80 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2017, 10:02 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Nor does he quote Holmes, dissenting in Abrams v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the symposium from the McGill Law Journal: Indigenous Law and Legal Pluralism ARTICLES 0 Introduction: Moving from the Why to the How of Indigenous Law Fraser Harland 721 0 An Inside Job: Engaging with Indigenous Legal Traditions through Stories Val Napoleon and Hadley Friedland 725 0 WSÁNEĆ Legal Theory and the Fuel Spill at SELEKTEL (Goldstream River) Robert YELḰÁTTE Clifford 755 0 Heroes, Tricksters, Monsters, and Caretakers: Indigenous Law and Legal… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:47 am by Olivier Moréteau
Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law WorldEdited by Matthew Groves and Greg WeeksThe recognition and enforcement of legitimate expectations by courts has been a striking feature of English law since R v North and East Devon Health Authority; ex parte Coughlan [2001] 3 QB 213. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Daily Record Staff
Doory, of the first-degree murder and attempted armed robbery of Lawrence Peterson; the first-degree murder and attempted armed robbery of Joseph Ulrich; and ... [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
In the LA Review of Books, Amy Brady reviews Richard Kluger’s, Indelible Ink: The Trials of John Peter Zenger and the Birth of America’s Free Press, which “tells the complex and thoroughly engaging history leading up to and including the moment of Zenger’s trial for seditious libel of a government figure,” and Stephen Rhode reviews two new books on the death penalty, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment (which provides “a clear and… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
But 50 years on, how deep and long-lasting are the rights associated with Miranda v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:52 am by Amy Howe
” At the Bill of Health Blog, Greg Lipper discusses Zubik v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 62 [week ending on Sunday 6 September] - Copyright and industrial design in Japan | Greek political slogans and trade marks | Moral rights in legal works | Economist v patents | CJEU in Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV | Copyright over criminals' works | IPEC in Minder Music & Another v Sharples | Apple’s European slide-to-unlock patent declared invalid… [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
Following Eleonora's post earlier this week on the recent Opinion of the European Copyright Society in a reference for a preliminary ruling currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), this being HP Belgium v Reprobel, today the IPKat is delighted to host a guest contribution by Dr Ulrich Börger (Harte-Bavendamm) on a recent Austrian case on the very topic of levies, in which he acted for one of the parties to… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 7:19 pm by LTA-Editor
” The article explores the ramifications of the MadStad Engineering v. [read post]