Search for: "United States of America v. Four Firearms"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Allen v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States, 11-9873, raises the question whether the mandatory minimum for brandishing a firearm, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:50 am
In the United States of America v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
* She also argued, based on United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Four additional, on-line only chapters cover some special topics. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
United States, 10-8659, and Vargas-Solis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:31 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:43 am
Here’s a thought: Eli Whitney not only invented the cotton gin, but went on to create one of the most successful firearm companies of the era, providing weapons to the United States government, which for the first time ever used interchangeable parts. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
It's the gang capital of America. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am
In a state v. state case, a state can assert the interests of its nationals. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Flynn, 475 U.S. 560 (1986) (four uniformed officers seated immediately behind defendant); Carey v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
Flynn, 475 U.S. 560 (1986) (four uniformed officers seated immediately behind defendant); Carey v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:41 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
And not only that, but there is a 1988 federal United States Supreme Court case, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
One such so-called maxim originated with Justice Stone's "Footnote Four" in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Casper, No. 06-11381 A conviction and sentence for possession of drugs with intent to distribute, possession of a firearm by a felon, and possession of an unregistered firearm are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) a denial of a motion to suppress evidence without having conducted a hearing; 2) the warrantless detention and subsequent search of his vehicle; and 3) the reasonableness of the sentence. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
