Search for: "United States v. 74 CASES, ETC."
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
The United States has a "federated system," said Hall, with four main biometric databases that after 9/11 all began to share data directly or indirectly. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 7:10 am
Components (central processing units, displays, etc.)In his opening presentation, Samsung's lead counsel Charles Verhoeven reportedly stated that "Samsung products comprise 26% of the component cost of the iPhone, including its flash memory and main memory", and asked: "Who is the real innovator?" [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Hyundai Merchant Marine Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Sibal urged that while Section 12 of the Act vested the Copyright Board with the authority to regulate its own procedure and Section 74 conferred certain limited powers of a civil court on the Board, the same were procedural in nature and did not vest the Board with a substantive right to grant interim orders under Section 31 of the Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug… [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
You won’t find a law in the United States Code or the federal regulations entitled “Prosecutorial Discretion. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
Individuals tend to fare worse (.65 v. .74 for use, .27 v. .37 for ITU). [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
Nat’l Gypsum Co., 74 F.3d 1209, 1212 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
Rubber Mulch Etc., LLC, 620 F.3d 1287, 1296 (Fed. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
Insider hacking reached 48% of overall hacking activity in the 2010 Data Breach Investigations Report by Verizon Business, an IP communications and information technology service, and the United States Secret Service (USSS). [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:41 am
The appellant could not involve in the day to day affairs of the second respondent company and other companies as he had to travel to United Kingdom often for his treatment. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
It Don't Mean A Thing If It Ain't Got That Swing On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
If the applicant does not prove the case, no protection order is made.3. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
Pennzoil Products Co., 305 F.3d 368, 372-74 (5th Cir. 2002) (not an FDCA case); Dial A Car, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
The Normative Case against Expansion of Public Interest Regulation A. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:04 am
Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
