Search for: "United States v. Boeing Co."
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Ex parte order based on misleading information: Franz Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co, KG v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
WEINSTEIN, PINSON & RILEY, P.S., EVAN MOSCOV, and EGS FINANCIAL CARE, INC., formerly known as NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.No. 14 C 739.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm
The Court, in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
T-Online.de AG & Co. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 20, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black male's age and race/failure-to-promote + retal + HWE claims5th Circuit* Barnett v The Boeing Co., No. 08-20232. (5th Cir. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 10:29 am
In our follow-up article on Boeing Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
To my knowledge, as of today, Boeing and the FAA both have details about defects in software used in Boeing's 737 Max airplanes that contributed to the crashes of two 737 Max airplanes that killed hundreds of people. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Ruling Heard ‘Round the Country: Baehr v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who is a co-sponsor of the bill. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 5:06 pm
”The False Claims Act imposes treble damages and penalties on those who knowingly and falsely claim money from the United States or knowingly fail to pay money owed to the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
That may be because with this decision and earlier decisions in Marchand and In re Boeing Co. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
The Boeing Co., No. 07-16903 (9th Cir. [read post]
