Search for: "United States v. Christopher Long" Results 61 - 80 of 470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm by India McKinney
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm by India McKinney
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:26 am by Christopher Bird
"Some might argue not - after all, there is a long tradition in the United States of elected officials defying the judiciary, all the way back to President Andrew Jackson defying the U.S. [read post]
The overbreadth doctrine is “strong medicine,” and has a tendency, as Justice Antonin Scalia noted in United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm by Brian Fong
The California Supreme Court issued its long awaited ruling in Mendoza v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:02 pm by Joe Rosenbaum
 That effort was derailed by a series of court decisions, culminating in a 9-3 en banc decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which then led to the State of New Jersey petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Or the defendant can be a foreigner who has never even set foot in the U.S., so long as an "act in furtherance" was committed within United States territory. [read post]