Search for: "United States v. Expert Environmental Control, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
__________ Recommendation 5 April 2016 to exclude Duke Energy Corp., Duke Energy Carolinas LLC and Duke Energy Progress Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
The case, Department of Toxic Substances Control v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
Facts: This case (Resco Products, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 559 (2009). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am
United States Food and Drug Admin., Civ. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Summary and Analysis of the 2011 Gasoline Benzene Pre-Compliance Report (2012). [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm
It is unprecedented in 49 prior trials and depositions where I have testified, in federal and state courts all over the United States, including many cases in Texas. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
And the United States Navy was ahead of Selikoff in terms of detailing the difficulty in controlling confined-space asbestos lagging operations onboard ships, and the consequent asbestosis hazards[5]. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
WorldCom, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
The Nazis invoked cultural arguments, explicitly or implicitly to reject “Jewish” science; religious groups in the United States invoke religious and political considerations to place creationism on an equal or superior footing with evolution; anti-vaccine advocacy groups embrace case reports over rigorous epidemiologic analyses. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
2 May 2014, 2:59 pm
”Read More: Justices Back Rule Limiting Coal PollutionHighmark, Inc. v. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:41 am
Personnel records allowed me to establish that Onondaga Pottery had hired a young scientist, Edward Schramm, in the 1930’s, from the United States Bureau of Standards. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
