Search for: "United States v. Guido"
Results 61 - 80
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am
Case of Ahmet Atahür Söyler v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am
The last century’s landmark cases, which established products liability as it currently exists in the United States, involved consumer products.[1] The consumer products were sold to, or were designed to be used by, ordinary consumers, without any technical training or knowledge. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 3:30 am
United States, 398 F.2d 167 (2d Cir. 1968). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
Haymond and United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 10:20 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:16 am
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
United States: The question before the Court is whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the Fifth Amendment’s double jeopardy clause, which allows a defendant to be tried in both federal and state court for the same crime. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Judge Guido Calabresi had found no preemption. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935); Nortz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
And in Madison v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:00 am
Guido, in which the justices will decide next term whether the 20-employee minimum in the Age Discrimination in Employment Act applies to state and local governments, concluding “that application of such numerosity requirements [to] governmental entities is not particularly appropriate. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:13 am
Items written by BG Lieber on military and constitutional law: Constitutional Uses of the Military Forces of the United States, 1898. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Following United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
He concludes that “Americans don’t agree on when the amendment was approved, and, I am sure, some in their hearts believe it should not bind the United States today. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 7:30 am
In Hively v. [read post]
