Search for: "United States v. James Robertson" Results 61 - 74 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2007, 3:17 pm
District Judge James Robertson last December ordered Hamdan's habeas plea dismissed. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Calk had hoped then-President Trump would name him to a powerful government post, including treasury secretary, defense secretary, or ambassador to France or the United Kingdom. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court, in deciding this case, is not likely to reopen its 1872 precedent in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm by Bill Marler
Outbreaks of enteric virus illness in the United States: requisite for development of viral guidelines. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]