Search for: "United States v. La Plant"
Results 61 - 80
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
The initial volume, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court, edited by Kathryn M. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:23 am
Resources, http://water.state.co.us/surfacewater/swrights/pages/priorapprop.aspx (last visited Feb. 23, 2018). [4] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm
On 12 June 2020 Elisabeth Laing J handed down judgment in the case of Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) (heard 20 May 2020). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Click Here LA area polystyrene manufacturer Lifoam Industries pays $450,000 over violations of federal, state clean-air laws. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 6:43 am
Mittens is all caught up with IPKatimage source: LA TimesPatentsYour input is needed! [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Super. 2007); Plante v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
”On March 8, 1971, her lawsuit against the Salvation Army under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was dismissed from the United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
Accused Robert Wilson of appropriating a Bugis myth for int’l production of I La Galigo, 2004-2005—he asked for local permission but state said that wasn’t enough. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:16 am
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Danny Weitzner - Open Internet Policy), United States: How many lines is de minimis? [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
