Search for: "United States v. Lord" Results 61 - 80 of 1,509
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
While a few regulatory decisions are still outstanding, the Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard merger review process now comes down to the United Kingdom and the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am by Matrix Law
The Court will determine whether the Supreme Court should depart from the judgment of the House of Lords in James Buchanan & Co. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am by Yvonne Dutton
” And in 2014, after extensive consultations with ICC States Parties, civil society, academia, and relevant United Nations agencies, the OTP launched its Policy Paper. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords clarified the “serious harm” test for defamation claims, stating that the claimant must prove that the publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to their reputation. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s a… [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
And as he narrates in volume one of Outside In, the starkest experiences of being an outsider came in his family’s transition to life in the United States. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
On 4 May 2023, a mere two weeks after the conclusion of the hearing, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Sandoz and Teva v BMS. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
The focus of this post, however, is the legislation on the disposal of altars and fonts; in the instant case, the Chancellor stated: “Since the altar will have been dedicated to its sacramental role in the celebration of the Eucharist, or Lord’s Supper, it should not be profaned by any secular use which might result from its sale or disposal for any non-liturgical purpose. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Will Korn
Rosenthal, United States District Court judge for the Southern District of Texas, and Reagan W. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
For a detailed overview of Ruscoe v Cryptopia,please refer to our previous publication: Cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, New Zealand High Court holds The Hon Madam Justice Linda Chan noted that “the preponderance of jurisprudence recognises the proprietary nature of cryptocurrencies” and included case law on cryptocurrencies being considered as “property” (or similar definition) in various jurisdictions including England and Wales, the… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
United States The US Copyright Office has rejected an attempt to register copyright in an image generated by AI tools. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by INFORRM
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]