Search for: "United States v. Monroe" Results 61 - 80 of 260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2009, 5:45 am by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Foster v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" As the United States Supreme Court commented in Pickering v Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563* “Free and unhindered debate on matters of public importance constitutes a core value of the First Amendment. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The CBA further provides that the CSEA may request arbitration with respect to a grievance, but no provision in the CBA permits an employee to request arbitration, nor is there a provision that makes the employees a party to the collective bargaining agreement (see generally Matter of Case v Monroe Community Coll., 89 NY2d 438, 442-443 [1997]; Matter of Diaz v Pilgrim State Psychiatric Ctr. of State of N.Y., 62 NY2d 693, 695 [1984]). [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Other clauses use the word "office" or "officer" followed by a modifier, such as "of the United States," "under the United States," or "under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Under these enactments, that State defied the authority of the United States judiciary and the protests of other States. [read post]
  Fortunately for LMI and Blazer, the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
But in an homage to the United State Supreme Court, the Court was divided 3-3-1, and so even after reading all the opinions in the case it is not clear what it means for the future.The primary opinion, issue by Chief Judge Lippman, states, "The threshold, and we believe dispositive, issue on these appeals is whether a resentencing sought by a defendant to correct an illegally lenient sentence is effective" to move the date of that prior conviction. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by Michael Dimino
  Because the United States government prosecuted Mr. [read post]