Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With Buildings"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
In Murray v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 11:44 am
In Lingerman v. 6 Mill Road, LLC (Ct. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm
An O'Shea, 8 NY3d at p. 3, the Court stated: "Article 18 allowed special assessing units to apply different fractional assessment percentages to each of four classes of property: one-, two- and three-family residential property (class one); all other residential property except hotels and motels and other similar commercial property (class two); utility property (class three); and all other (class four) (see… [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:42 am
Boston: City buildings (those the City owns or for which the City regularly pays energy bills); Non-residential buildings (those located on a parcel of land with one or more buildings of at least 35,000 square feet and of which 50% or more is used for non-residential purposes, and which are not City buildings); and Residential buildings (i) (a parcel with one or more buildings with 35 or more dwelling… [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:06 pm
” In Saffie v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:07 am
United States, involving another do-gooder, this time in Burlington, Vermont, trying to convert an old railbed to a recreational trail. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
The Parker Place Project proposes two five-story mixed use buildings and a three-story residential building – for a total of 155 residential units and over 20,000 square feet of commercial space – on three separate Shattuck Avenue parcels that are currently occupied by the Berkeley Honda car dealership. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am
The problem, of course, is that how one selects data of past performance to project future performance is part and parcel of the methodology of making the economic projection. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Twenty-four states have had at least one initiative during the period 1904-2012. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed and held that the Florida Supreme Court erred on both grounds. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:53 am
United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision in, Koontz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
Al., Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Conveyance of real property -- Limitation of actions -- Where agreement between school board and property owner clearly and unambiguously required owner to deed to school board by a specified date forty acres of land meeting certain outlined conditions, owner breached the agreement on the specified date when owner failed to deed a compliant forty-acre parcel to the school board -- Statute of limitations not tolled by… [read post]
