Search for: "United States v. Owens. in Re Owens" Results 61 - 80 of 139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation  (Winrow v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Judge Clement first analyzed and concluded that United States Supreme Court jurisprudence does not require punitive damages in unseaworthiness cases. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
Owens-Illinois, Inc., et al., No. 8704-1464 (Philadelphia Cty. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
A class was certified.After the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Owens, Medical Decision Making (2d ed. 2014). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
  A “home” can be a single family dwelling, a 2-4 family home, a manufactured home, a condo unit,  or a residential coop unit. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
United States, 13-7120. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
For example, other trademarked colours include Owen Corning’s pink (panther) colour for fiberglass insulation (See In Re Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 774 F. 2d 1116 (Fed. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The resurgence of secularism: hostility towards religion in the United States and France. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources In an unpublished paper entitled “Quacks like a Duck: a New Test for News-Media Libel in the United States”, Carrie Leonetti of the University of Oregon School of Law argues that the actual-malice standard promotes sloppy reporting. [read post]