Search for: "United States v. Singh"
Results 61 - 80
of 360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
United States, which in 1923 held that Bhaghat Singh Thind, “a high caste Hindu, of full Indian blood, born [in] India” was not “a white person” under the naturalization laws. [read post]
18 May 2021, 12:54 pm
The hawala operation took drug proceeds from Canada to the United States and then to the Mexican cartels. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 8:05 pm
IN THE MATTER OF THE EXTRADITION OF MUHAMMAD FAROOQ TAWAKKAL, United States District Court E.D. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
The DOJ and Microsoft have both filed motions to dismiss as moot the seminal data privacy case before the Supreme Court this term, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:05 pm
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
The case concerned an Algerian national (the appellant) who entered the United Kingdom in 1996 and was refused asylum. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
God and the Illegal Alien, United States Immigration Law and a Theology of Politics by Robert W. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
The contrast with the approach of the Court of Appeal in British Chiropractic Assocation v Singh is instructive. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d at 77-78; see generally Singh v Sukhram, 56 AD3d at 192; Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d at 109-110). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:27 am
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
” Bigler, 451 F.3d at 733; Singh v. [read post]
