Search for: "Vides v. Vides"
Results 61 - 80
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
We’ll get back to you with loads of new developments and news throughout this week and at the end of it vide our next review. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:38 am
Vide letter dt. 30.06.2008, the Director General had specifically stated that Denel was to replace the rejected equipments.5. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:24 pm
The Assistant Registrar, vide his Order, rejected Mr. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 12:01 am
”The Ministry of Small Scale Industries appointed 02.10.2006 as the date on which the provisions of the Act would come into force, vide Notification dt. 18.07.2006 (pdf), published in the Official Gazette on 21.07.2006. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Section 320, Cr.P.C. mentions certain offences as compoundable, certain other offences as compoundable with the permission of the Court, and the other offences as non- compoundable vide Section 320(7). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
Bailey v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 6:11 am
Pollution Control Board v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:47 am
Modi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:38 am
bas Klubs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:57 am
bas Klubs v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
’” (Similar sentiments about the role of NGOs can be seen in Steel and Morris v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR 403, [89] and Vides Aizsardz? [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:22 am
(Vide: Vassiliades v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 1:38 am
[Vide National Small Industries Corporation Limited vs. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:40 pm
Sections 35 and 35A have been considered recently by this Court in Salem Advocates Bar Association v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:59 pm
It is well settled that a notice refused to be accepted by the addressee can be presumed to have been served on him (vide Harcharan Singh v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
Though the discretionary power vested in the Supreme Court under Article 136 is apparently not subject to any limitation, the Court has itself imposed certain limitations upon its own powers vide Ram Saran Das and Bros. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:29 pm
(Vide: Masalti v. [read post]
