Search for: "WHITE V. GRACE"
Results 61 - 80
of 200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1… [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
The “smoking gun” tape as the coup de grace. [read post]
24 May 2015, 12:30 pm
Ever since Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
Dept. of Agriculture v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
German v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
In Connick v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Connick v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
In Brandecker v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 am
Florida, Jurek v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am
The Smoking Gun tape as the coup de grace. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
" Assuming that's true, one would want to know whether it's a response to a shift in attitudes or mostly a litigation-avoidance strategy in response to Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The White House has its first Senate-confirmed national cyber director, but the position’s role in the executive branch hasn’t been spelled out yet. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Supreme Court in Miller v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:14 pm
" Herrera v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 1:14 am
Grace will consider that unfurling the banner of freedom of expression is its own justification for the state to employ coercion. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
White. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
The remainder of last week’s relists are back for another round: White v. [read post]
