Search for: "WIFE v. v. HUSBAND V."
Results 61 - 80
of 6,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Premiums for the policy were paid from the husband’s employment earnings during the years of his marriage to wife until his death in 1996. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:55 am
Wife says it's worth $1.1 million, whereas Husband says it's worth $1.02 million. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
A.M.P. v Benjamin, 201 AD3d 50, 57 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:03 pm
“While under Domestic Relations Law 234, the court has some discretion to make orders regarding possession of property under the circumstances of each case, nothing in the record demonstrates that the presence of the husband’s romantic partner at one of the marital residences in any way impacted the plaintiff wife’s safety. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:46 am
Though it remains more common for a wife to be at a financial disadvantage relative to her husband, in some couples, the wife earns a greater income than the husband. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm
Enter B.C. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Barrick v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
Wife put on forensic evidence that the average attorney in Washington/Allegheny County earned $128,000 a year and the trial court adopted that as husband’s earning capacity. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
His wife, “Susan Dent, who had not previously been directly involved in the business in any substantial way, took over the business”. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
His wife, “Susan Dent, who had not previously been directly involved in the business in any substantial way, took over the business”. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 8:59 pm
Pyper v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 1:47 pm
However, on January 18, 2024, the Appellate Division decided the case of Roik v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:50 am
Husband and wife are equal partners. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:02 am
In this case, though the wife had substantial assets in her own name, a majority of the assets were controlled by the husband. [read post]
