Search for: "Waterhouse v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:49 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation.Ramos v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:30 am
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
The plaintiffs argue that their cases are thus analogous to Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:10 am
In the 1989 landmark case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:09 am
” Citing the United States Supreme Court’s landmark holding in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:39 pm
In its brief in opposition, the DOJ also wrote, “To be sure, the United States disagrees with the court of appeals’ decision. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
United States: Former wrestler Hulk Hogan has lost a claim for an injunction to restrain the publication of a sex tape by the gossip website Gawker. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 1:44 am
But there have been a number of recent decisions that have relied on the United States Supreme Court holding in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Hibbs (2003), as well as the leading Title VII sex-stereotyping case Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 1:35 pm
The DOJ’s brief was clear that Title VII does not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination, and that “the EEOC is not speaking for the United States” and its position about the scope of Title VII is entitled to no deference. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
That strategy helped secure the unanimous 1991 Supreme Court ruling in UAW v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:52 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Price Waterhouse and its own decision in Smith v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
