Search for: "Watters v. AT"
Results 61 - 80
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 8:58 pm
Watters v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
In the spring of 2007, the Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision called Watters v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 12:31 pm
At the Washington Post, Tomoeh Murakami Tse discusses Watters v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
First of Omaha (Nat'l Bank Act preemption) Watters v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:48 am
Watters, 2009 U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:19 am
In Watters v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
Per my index, they new kids on the block disagreed in only four cases: United Haulers, Zuni Public School District, Watters v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
-At the Consumer Law and Policy Blog, Deepak Gupta discusses the Court's decision in Watters v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
” Watters, 550 U.S. at 12; see also Gibson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 2:37 pm
From The Blog of Legal Times: For the last two years, Justice Clarence Thomas has consistently recused himself in cases in which Wachovia Bank is a party -- most notably the landmark decision last week in Watters v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:47 pm
Lastly, Steve Vladeck has this post at Concurring Opinions discussing the significance of the Court's decision in Watters v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 7:17 pm
Justice Thomas recused himself in Watters v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Watters v Wachovia Bank, NA, 550 US 1 (2000), the Court of Appeals focused on the exercise of the national bank’s power to make real estate transactions. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Some orders have been made on foot of the Defamation Act, 2009 (also here) – see, for example, Lowry v Smyth (background here and here; coverage of the order here), Mellon v Associated Newspapers (coverage here), and Meegan v Associated Newspapers (coverage here) – but Watters v Independent Star [2010] IECC 1 (03 November 2010) remains the only reported judgment on provisions of the Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:20 pm
Finally, Todd Zywicki, in this post on the Volokh Conspiracy, mentions an AEI program about Watters v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 10:20 pm
[NYT] "Dodd-Frank reform law invites new litigation opportunities against mortgage lenders," overturns Watters v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:48 am
This past term, the Court faced a very similar deference/federal preemption question in Watters v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
” Watters v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 2:14 pm
by Elizabeth Renuart (National Consumer Law Center) Rather than discussing why the majority may be legally wrong (the dissent does an excellent job of that), my thoughts focus on the lines drawn by the decision and its potential practical effects. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:07 am
In Watters v. [read post]
