Search for: "William Michael Hart" Results 61 - 80 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2008, 11:05 am
Fleck of Holland & Hart, LLP, Jackson, Wyoming; and Patrick Murphy of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, PC of Casper, Wyoming. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
" H-Net has a timely review of Remembering the Revolution: Memory, History, and Nation Making from Independence to the Civil War edited by Michael A. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:08 am by New Books Script
K 346 T44 2011 Therapeutic jurisprudence and victim participation in justice : international perspectives edited by Edna Erez, Michael Kilchling, Jo-Anne Wemmers. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
At Casetext, Terry Hart analyzes last week’s ruling in in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:46 pm by Elim
., A Practitioner’s Guide to European Patent Law: For National Practice and the Unified Patent Court (Oxford: Hart 2019). [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
"  --Michael Parenti, final remarks, California State University, Channel Islands, March 11, 2004.IntroductionOur nation is awakening to the fact that convenience-oriented industrial food products, which have substantially displaced our traditional diet, have altered our collective health for the worse. [read post]
23 May 2013, 1:44 pm by Roshonda Scipio
AbortionAbortion in the United States : a compilation of federal and state laws / edited by Tobe Liebert .Buffalo, NY : William S. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Henderson (Holland & Hart, Denver), Clara Solomon (New York University). [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am by New Books Script
KF 4754.5 R83 2011 Cases and materials on sexual orientation and the law / by William B. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
” As expected, the proposal immediately came under fire by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist.[1] In criticizing the proposal he deployed the playbook that he uses to systematically oppose initiatives to protect creators of cultural materials;[2] namely, to deny there is any problem to be addressed, contend that even if there is problem the laws don’t need changing, and to engage in scaremongering[3], in this case, by claiming the proposal is “radical” and… [read post]