Search for: "Williams v. Peters" Results 61 - 80 of 996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Elaine Hou
Symposium on William Novak’s “New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State”: William Novak’s book New Democracy contends that the modern-day American regulatory state took root long before the New Deal. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
 Kenya Citizens and data privacy experts have expressed concerns about a mobile-loan scheme which was launched by Kenyan President William Ruto, Quartz reports. [read post]
A dissenting judge argued that one of the patents contained plausibly valid claims that recited technical improvements to a graphical user interface (International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
Peter Stanley sued stating that he was entitled to a hearing on the subject of who would have custody of children that were his. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:15 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Geofabrics Limited v Fiberweb Geosynthetics Limited [2022] EWHC 2363 (Pat) Geofabrics Limited (“Geofabrics”) has been awarded £13.4 million in damages for patent infringement, concluding a 5 year long dispute with Fiberweb Geosynthetics Limited (“Fiberweb”). [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:50 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
  Roman Martinez (Latham Watkins) is set to argue for Warhol and Lisa Blatt (Williams Connolly) for Goldsmith. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Peter Dutton has discontinued his High Court Appeal against Shane Bassi. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
The judge considered the factors on secondary indications set out by Laddie J in Haberman v Jackel [1999] F.S.R. 683 (and approved by Jacob LJ in Schlumberger v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2010] EWC Civ 819). [read post]