Search for: "Wills v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 61 - 80
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, (3rd Cir., July 26, 2013), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision denied a preliminary injunction sought by a family-owned business to stop enforcement of the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:08 pm
Department of Health and Human Services; Jacob Lew, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:25 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
A series of conversations is about to begin, or may already have begun, between states, especially Republican states, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
The United States National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed by President Obama in March 2010. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
Secretary of State, 378 U. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
Secretary of [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:36 am
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:49 pm
In a statement, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said, “This proposal isn't limited to contraception, nor is it limited to any preventive service. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
Dan Wootton, former showbiz editor at the News of the World, told Lord Justice Leveson he believes all celebrities have a right to privacy, especially in areas of sexuality, health, pregnancy and family. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
When we carefully analyze this section, the wisdom of the legislature becomes quite evident and clear that the legislature was keen to ensure respect for the personal liberty and also pressed in service the age-old principle that an individual is presumed to be innocent till he is found guilty by the court. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
From a policy standpoint, providers argue that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will never have the resources to police all fifty states for compliance with the Medicaid statutes absent provider lawsuits. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Interference Central to any review of a healthcare resource decision is the Secretary of State for Health’s fundamental duty under section 3 of the National Health Service Act 2006 to provide healthcare services to patients to such extent as he considers necessary to meet all reasonable requirements. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Malicious wounding; mayhem; willful assault resulting in grievous bodily harm. 3. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm
The implicit answer the brief gives is fairly typical for implied cause-of-action cases, i.e., that federal enforcement actions are theoretically available, and that private enforcement would produce potentially inconsistent judicial interpretations of the equal access provision that could interfere with the Secretary of Health and Human Services' authority to administer the Medicaid Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
Because after all, there has to be a limit on how much we allow monetary calculations to trump our own humanity. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 2:37 pm
Summary of Proposed Changes to Privacy, Security and Enforcement Rules On July 14, 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) published proposed regulations pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act). [read post]
