Search for: "Wise v. Harris" Results 61 - 80 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Alito Jr. would have the Court’s opinion in Harris v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/7e8CRTEkIT -> Identity not disclosed for privacy reasons DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:43 am by Rick Garnett
Simmons-Harris dissent – to “protect[t] the Nation’s social fabric from religious conflict. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:42 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
A Very Long Limitation Period for Unjust Enrichment Claims in McConnell v HuxtableEx-lawyer who used his firm’s credit card to start new firm gets probationIs Rob Ford baiting anti-gay voters? [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:30 am by Elysia Cherry
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, January 3, 2014:Federal Judge Strikes Down Florida’s Welfare Drug Testing LawThe Global Lawyer | Toronto mayor seeks help from sole practitioner lawyerUS judge gives up his celebrated blog after story airs criticismChief Justice Roberts: Continued budget cuts would create safety risk, commercial uncertaintyMusharraf suffers 'heart problem' on way to treason hearingToronto’s crack-smoking mayor… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Set Aside Time For Just Thinking About the Material: When I was in full-time legal practice, a wise partner and mentor lamented that the standard time sheets that lawyers use for recording how they spend their time, so that clients can receive some detail along with their bills, contained categories for many lawyerly tasks—such as researching, drafting, editing, sending emails, and participating in conferences and telephone conversations—but did not contain a standard category… [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:04 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Friday, August 2, 2013:"We have now entered into an era where our assurances of confidentiality must always be asterisked." [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:53 am by Buce
The point is that V seems to treat it as a statement of considered policy—as if the Wise Men sat around the polished oak conference table in the Treasury Department situation room and said “it's agreed then—we'll have a controlled disintegration. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
in Prose Wks. (1890) V. 173   Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
On Tuesday, Mr Justice Newey, giving judgment in the High Court, England and Wales, thought not in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v Harris. [read post]