Search for: "Wood v. Scott" Results 61 - 80 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Anushka Limaye
"   In the latest Aegis Series Paper from the Hoover Institution, Andrew Keane Woods pushed against the idea that technology firms have effectively become sovereign actors. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 16 to 19 April 2018, Nicklin J heard the trial in the case of Monir v Wood. [read post]
In a ruling earlier this month, an Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals judge ruled in Scott, Blane, and Darren Recovery L.L.C., Anova Foods Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 4:43 am by William Ford
Kahn posted the full audio of oral argument in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
Andrew Keane Woods summarized and analyzed the oral arguments. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” Andrew Keane Woods analyzes the argument at Lawfare. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Vanessa Sauter
  ICYMI, Yesterday on Lawfare Scott R. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In an op-ed at Reuters, Scott Lemieux weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:10 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
”[v] We know of the August 7, 2017,[vi] opinion because Chief Judge Wood did something extraordinary. [read post]