Search for: "Xerox Corp." Results 61 - 80 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, the Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court's ruling that a report prepared by an outside consultant for the agency was not shown to be eligible for the "intra-agency materials exemption" permitted by FOIL.Public Officers Law §87 sets out the "ground rules" for a party accessing government records. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:00 am
And in Xerox Corp., the Commission entered into a consent decree with Xerox settling a Commission challenge to Xerox's acquisition of the Battelle patents on plain paper copiers allegedly with the purpose and effect of monopolizing the plain paper copier market.While acknowledging that such actions aren't "bullet-proof" and that additional policy concerns exist, Rosch suggested that the FTC would consider filing such actions after a… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 8:45 am
On the other hand, "Xerox" was considered to be a candidate to become a generic name until the Xerox Corp. began spending a great deal of money to prevent misuse of the mark. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:22 am by Jennifer Smith
It’s now part of the normal process,” says Xerox Corp. general counsel Don H. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:18 pm
It is said that the settlement resolves claims that Morgan Stanley failed to appropriately supervise these brokers, which allowed the brokers to allegedly mislead employees of Eastman Kodak Co. and Xerox Corp. into taking early retirement and investing retirement funds with them. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
The case stems from a challenge by former Xerox Corp. chief financial officer Barry Romeril, who sued for the ability to deny the Securities and Exchange Commission’s fraud allegations after he signed a 2003 settlement with the agency. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:54 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
A group of Xerox Corp. retirees who left and then returned before retiring brought the suit. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:57 am by The Public Employment Law Press
BOARD OF EDUCATION B 52 3RD AVE BRENTWOOD NY 11717 ASSOCIATES CAPITAL BANK BOARD OF EDUCATION C 333 7TH AVE NEW YORK NY 10001 CDW LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF NEW 65 COURT ST RM 712 ACCTS PAYABLE BROOKLYN NY 11201 CDW LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF NEW YORK 65 COURT ST OFFICE OF PAYMENTS AND SUPPO RT BROOKLYN NY 11201 CDW LLC BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY OF NEW YORK 333 SEVENTH AVE NEW YORK NY 11201 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION D … [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The case is Xerox Corp. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Vincent LoTempio
(see chart below World Wide Ownership of US Patents 2010) Top-50 US Patent Assignees in 2010 (As reported by IFI) International Business Machines Corp 5896 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (Korea) 4551 Microsoft Corp 3094 Canon K K (Japan) 2552 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2482 Toshiba Corp (Japan) 2246 Sony Corp (Japan) 2150 Intel Corp 1653 LG Electronics Inc (Korea) 1490 Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P 1480 … [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:42 pm
Bush, as general counsel at Xerox Corp., and as Under Secretary of Commerce under President George H.W. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:10 pm
”); the Generic Theater in Norfolk, Virginia; the Generic Manufacturing Corp. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by OBABL Staff
Vice President Deputy General Counsel and Chief Ethics Officer Xerox Clarence Otis Jr. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 10:16 am
.; British Telecommunications plc; British-American Tobacco Co Ltd; BTG plc; Delphi Corp.; Dow Corning Ltd; Dyson Technology Ltd; ExxonMobil Chemical Ltd; Ford of Europe; Fujitsu Services Ltd; G E Healthcare; GKN plc; GlaxoSmithKline plc; Hewlett-Packard Ltd; IBM UK Ltd; Infineum UK Ltd; Kodak Ltd; Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd; Microsoft Ltd; Nestle UK Ltd; Nokia UK Ltd; NXP Semiconductors UK Limited; Pfizer Ltd; Philips Electronics UK Ltd; Pilkington Group Ltd; Procter & Gamble… [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:44 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Forty-eight companies, including Nike, Time Warner Cable, Aetna, Exelon Corp., and Xerox had signed a brief arguing that the law negatively affected their businesses. [read post]