Search for: "Young v. Rogers"
Results 61 - 80
of 276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 3:26 am
’” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Roger Schechter remarks that it is “curious … how little attention any of the Justices paid to the unique features of trademark law” in Iancu v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
The libel claim in Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm has been heard in the Federal Court. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:19 am
Photo credit: Freewinds – Roger Wollstadt – Flickr: Aruba – Freewinds, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons / wikimedia. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Lindsay, Roger Clarkeand Elizabeth Coombs, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law, Salinger Privacy, University of Canberra, UTS: Law, Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd and University of Malta Privacy Law’s False Promise, Washington University Law Review, Vol. 97, No. 3, 2019, Ari Ezra Waldman, New York Law School Carpenter v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 12:49 pm
Reflex Media, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Kali v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” [4] The definition of substantial costs is 1.5 times more than (regular) partial indemnity costs; Punitive costs have been described by the Supreme Court of Canada as appropriate “only where there has been reprehensible, scandalous or outrageous conduct on the part of one of the parties” (Young v Young, [1993] 4 SCR 3, 1993 at para 260) [5] Delichte v Rogers, 2013 MBQB 93, M. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 7:13 pm
One of the most important of those was the precedent set in the 2000 case of Brooks v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
Juni v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 3:01 am
Ross, IJ Short Circuit, on Young v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
Aaron Nielson is an associate law professor at Brigham Young University and the weekly author of D.C. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am
”); Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Young. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am
The exclusion of Native people from US citizenship was further established by Elk v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:15 am
Kahn posted the Supreme Court ruling in Jesner v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Within a week of Martin’s departure, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced that the NFL had retained New York law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to conduct “an independent investigation” of what happened to Martin. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Within a week of Martin’s departure, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced that the NFL had retained New York law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to conduct “an independent investigation” of what happened to Martin. [read post]
