Search for: "boiling-art"
Results 61 - 80
of 403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 7:39 am
In my opinion, most arguments against software patents boil down to concerns about prior art. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 9:59 am
On the first issue, the Federal Circuit found evidence to support the district court that one of skill in the art would measure the viscosity at room temperature in the absence of a specified temperature. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
See how many times a person loses one's blues through great music or other performing arts, for instance. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 9:05 am
As business realist, my take was: Used as collectables, NFT’s value proposition boils down to the fun ‘bragging rights’ mixed with the fear of missing. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
With regard to the [opponent’s] reference to document D4 the Board notes that according to established case law, when examining novelty combining separate pieces of prior art is only permissible in exceptional cases, such as for example when there is a specific reference in one prior art document (primary document) to a second prior art document, construing the primary document (see T 153/85 [4.2]). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
Cir. 2004)); see also Sundance, 550 F.3d at 1365.5 Thus, in appropriate cases, the ultimate inference as to the existence of a motivation to combine references may boil down to a question of “common sense,” appropriate for resolution on summary judgment or JMOL. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:50 am
Boils it all down to cynical platitudes. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
It boils down to the simple fact that 99% of the stuff out there is positively not worth a subway ride. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:46 pm
At one point that day we were on the other side of the glacier on the col du Midi when the clouds boiled up from Chamonix. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
Interference boils down to prior art validity - whether the earlier claims invalidate the later ones. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:01 am
Bring to a boil 1 quart of cream and pour slowly on the egg mixture. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
Cover pan and quickly bring just to boiling. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:24 am
Indeed, in paragraph [0008] "excellent aesthetics" is not mentioned per se, but rather as an aspect of the need allegedly existing in the prior art "for multi-compartment pouches with improved strength, handling and dissolution characteristics as well as excellent aesthetics" (emphasis added by the Board).The same reasoning applies to claim 5.Therefore, the Board concludes that claims 1 and 5 are interpreted by the skilled person as necessarily implying the presence of… [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
This boiled down to whether there could be unfair advantage under Art.5(2) without (a) confusion or (b) detriment to the earlier mark.Since only one of the types of harm mentioned in Art.5(2) is needed for there to be infringement, there could be no need for detriment to repute or distinctiveness for unfair advantage to be made out. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 11:15 am
Chu criticized Intel's invalidity contentions by saying Intel came with one prior art reference, then added another, and yet another. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The [opponent] further argued that, since silanes undergo hydrolysis, low-boiling organic liquids like methanol and ethanol are formed that remain in the composition. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:45 am
Furthermore, a lot of the wrangling in a lawsuit boils down to controlling what information is and is not presented to the jury. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:31 pm
“Thus, in appropriate cases, the ultimate inference as to the existence of a motivation to combine references may boil down to a question of ‘common sense. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:58 pm
These articles relate to the conduct of public utilities and state-owned entities (now covered by Art. 7 of the AML), selling at below cost (now covered by Art. 17(1) and (2) of the AML) tying (now covered by Art. 17(5) of the AML), and abuse of administrative power (now covered by Art. 32-37 of the AML). [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:01 pm
Normally I do not present decisions of the Disciplinary Board, but I found this one quite entertaining.The appeal was filed by a candidate who had failed the EQE 2009 after having been awarded the following marks: A: 49; B: 55; C: 39; D: 57.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] The appellant pointed out that the (fictitious) client’s letter on which paper A was based clearly and unambiguously indicated that the client did not desire to obtain patent protection for the process using… [read post]
