Search for: "v. Wright et al" Results 61 - 80 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2007, 6:07 am
Decisions finding virtual representation have often applied the factors we adopt today, see 18A WRIGHT ET AL., supra, § 4457 at 521-28 (collecting cases), and the parties generally agree they are appropriate factors to consider.. . .An appropriate test for virtual representation must consider and balance competing interests in due process and efficiency. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:41 am
Amersino Marketing Group, LLC (29-CA-27623, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 58) Brooklyn, NY Nov. 19, 2007. [read post]
4 Aug 2006, 8:56 am
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in Pfizer et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 2757 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 12:08 pm by Mack Sperling
Board of Comm’rs, 292 N.C. 369, 376, 233 S.E.2d 889, 893 (1977)(quoting Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 1442 (1971)). [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:47 pm
  Specifically, note that the point I’m making on the economics is different than the ex ante competition point argued by Easterbrook and responded to by Litan et al that competition for sophisticated investors on the margin will protect the unsophisticated investors. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am by Bernard Bell
  RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF THE LAW GOVERNING LAWYERS §82, §93 (2000); 24 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ET. [read post]