Search for: "Able v. United States" Results 781 - 800 of 10,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 10:56 am by Law Office of Ava George Stewart, P.C.
 Earlier today, the Supreme Court of the United States(SCOTUS) issued it's opinion in Missouri v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:07 am by Isaul Verdin, Immigration Lawyer
The result of Vartelas is basically that LPRs with convictions prior to April 1, 1997 can generally take innocent, casual and brief trips outside the United States without jeopardizing their LPR status upon return to the United States. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 10:16 am by Howard Friedman
  Americans United for Separation of Church and State has issued a statement supporting her nomination. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 10:52 am by Richard Primus
  A creative legislative drafter using the techniques that Congress used to reenact most of the coverage of the Gun-Free School Zones Act after United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A recent finding from a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of Texas is helpful. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:22 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasOpinion Date: 5/11/09Cite: Courtoom Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:21 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court established new law regarding the confrontation clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Susan Rose-Ackerman
If imported to the United States, congressional review would freeze rulemaking for all but the most anodyne texts—even if it could circumvent the holding in INS v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States Western District Court in Austin issued an opinion in June of 2015, dealing with this issue. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:18 am
The 9th Circuit blog has an interesting post about a predictable "cop as expert" case (United States v. [read post]