Search for: "Andrews v. State " Results 781 - 800 of 5,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2013, 9:41 pm
Ten Years of the International Criminal Court in the Asia-Pacific RegionSarah Williams & Andrew Byrnes, Foreword Steven Freeland, International Criminal Justice in the Asia-Pacific Region: The Role of the International Criminal Court Treaty Regime Amrita Kapur, Asian Values v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
Several states and state agencies (state petitioners) challenge the primary annual fine PM standard. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
A 540-pound blackjack dealer, who was fired after being twice disciplined for violating a casino’s dress code and break policies, could not show that he was disabled under the West Virginia Human Rights Act (WVHRA), the state high court held in an unpublished decision (Andrew O. v Racing Corp of West Virginia d/b/a Mardi Gras Casino and Resort, June 24, 2013, per curiam). [read post]
Other governors, such as Andrew Cuomo of New York and Jay Inslee of Washington, have ordered particularly far-reaching limits on congregating in response to the advanced threat confronting their constituents. [read post]
Case date: 09 May 2023 Case number: No. 22-1291 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Exploring this Term’s decision New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
The referendum was of course advisory, as stated in paragraph 106 of the judgment, and even accepted by the most high profile Leave campaigner, Nigel Farage, speaking on speaking on the Andrew Marr show5)BBC Andrea Marr show 6 November 2016. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by ernst
Vizcaya Partners Limited v Picard: Implications for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments at Common Law and BeyondAnthony Kennedy and Andrew Moran [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:17 pm by Rosalind English
Why else are the courts so inclined to protect institutions like the applicants in this case from harassment by protesters but declined to protect, for example, the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston against trespass (Tabernacle v Secretary of State for Defence) [2009] EWCA Civ 23)? [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:29 am by nflatow
  In November, the Supreme Court will hear United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]