Search for: "Apple v. Apple" Results 781 - 800 of 6,980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2022, 10:20 am by Florian Mueller
Against that backdrop, the Munich court's stance on the prematurity of such motions to dismiss is even easier to understand.In other Ericsson v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
  This argument is parallel to the ruling in Sonos v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac Foods Inc. is recalling apples shipped to 36 U.S. states for restaurants and grocery stores because of potential contamination from the bacterium Listeria. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:46 am
Appling the correct test in resolving a challenge to an administrative determinationMatter of Heather Duncan v Klein, 38 A.D.3d 380Heather Duncan held certification as a school bus escort and worked for the New York City Office of Pupil Transportation. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:52 pm
Author Subhrajyoti Saha, Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikipedia Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Birss) Optis Cellular Technology LLC and others v Apple Retail UK Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 2746 (Pat) (16 Oct 2020)This is the first of a series of trials between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and its subsidiaries ("Optis") and Apple Inc and its subsidiaries on whether certain patents held by [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 7:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A Los Angeles Times post Apple complains of 'patent trolls' obliquely refers to Apple's amicus brief in Highmark v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
In the news, Motorola lost a patent dispute in Munich against Apple regarding the "slide to unlock" feature on smartphones. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:10 pm
A federal judge has tossed out Psystar's antitrust lawsuit against Apple, one of its most important avenues to remaining in business. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:33 pm by Florian Mueller
And the only way to find out is to let push come to shove.Judge Koh may dread the notion but we'll probably see more Apple v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung litigation in California.In June 2013 the USPTO affirmed certain key claims of the rubber-banding (overscroll bounce) patent asserted in the first Apple v. [read post]