Search for: "DUKE v. STATE"
Results 781 - 800
of 2,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2009, 7:40 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:48 am
That is exactly what happened in Picarella v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
And, in doing so, the panel explains how plaintiffs may still seek monetary damages under Rule 23(b)(2) after Dukes. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
Dukes, the gender discrimination class-action lawsuit in which oral argument is scheduled for March. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:06 pm
The campaign finance case turned aside by the Court Monday (Duke, et al., v . [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 9:04 am
Many courts have accepted the Washington Supreme Court's holding in State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Durham, NC Duke University Press, 2008. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:33 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 1:36 pm
Trial Court Denies Class Action Certification Motion In Illinois State Court Employment Law Class Action Case Holding that Plaintiffs' Attorneys Failed to Provide a "Reasonable and Accurate Method of Calculating Damages on a Classwide Basis" Only a month after the Ninth Circuit upheld certification of a sex discrimination class action against Wal-Mart involving upwards of 2 million class members, see Dukes v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:17 pm
Dukes. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:26 pm
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
Adam Cohen of Time previews United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 5:00 pm
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 350–51 (2011) (quoting Gen. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
(See Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
Dukes] case. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:09 am
The Duke Libraries catalog can point to additional resources in the library collection. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Second, with respect to the Caremark claim, the more recent exposition of Caremark in Stone v. [read post]
