Search for: "Davies v Davies"
Results 781 - 800
of 8,997
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
White supremacists probably expected Plessy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:39 am
Sedlik v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:57 am
–Sedlik v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
It seems the Supreme Court will soon decide whether to grant review in the very significant case in which Republican challengers argue that the North Carolina Supreme Court overstepped federal constitutional bounds when it invalidated—as being inconsistent with the state constitution’s prohibitions on excessive partisanship—the congressional districting done by the North Carolina elected legislature. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:41 am
The case is Little v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
On May 18, 2022, the Fifth Circuit held in Jarkesy v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:30 pm
STF, LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:30 am
STF, LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:38 pm
” Davis v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:44 am
Supreme Court cases: Lucia v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Davis and his coauthors situate their argument for antiracist antitrust law in the context of Cung Le v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
As Judge Davis noted in his dissenting opinion in Jarkesy, “nowhere does the majority explain how the ALJ’s tenure protections interfere with the President’s ability to execute the laws. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at… [read post]
22 May 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:47 pm
Eugene Davis dissented from all three constitutional conclusions. [read post]