Search for: "Does 1-350"
Results 781 - 800
of 1,296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
Assuming that the threshold is $15,000, for 2014, the percentage would be calculated on $35,000 ($50,000 - $15,000) and 1% of that is $350. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:24 am
These changes come in response to the more than 350 comments the FTC received after publishing a comprehensive set of proposed revisions in September 2011 (which we blogged about here). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 6:11 am
The FTC received 350 comments, the agency said in an Aug. 1 statement announcing the proposed modifications. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:41 am
(Bug #14100254, Bug #65389) InnoDB: This fix improves the accuracy of the data in the information_schema table innodb_metrics for systems with innodb_buffer_pool_instances set to greater than 1. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:55 am
” The FTC developed these new definitions after reviewing the 350 public comments submitted in response to the Commission’s September 2011 proposal to amend the Rule. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
Footnotes [1] Buffett, Warren E. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
Footnotes [1] Buffett, Warren E. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm
University of Colorado, 220 F.R.D. 354, 350 (D. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Under New Zealand law, extradition is governed by the Extradition Act of 1999 and any bilateral treaty in place.1 The United States and New Zealand entered into an extradition treaty in 1970.2 That treaty lists thirty-two offenses for which subjects can be extradited; criminal copyright infringement is not one of them. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:26 am
Over 350 people were shown one of the three ads below, and asked about what they recalled. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Opponent 5’s tests of 22 December 2008 show that the addition of a dispersant (a) to oleic acid does not lead to any improvement in wear scar after 28/29 days at -30°C and that the addition of dispersant (a) to TOFA b after 27 days at -30ºC even leads to an increase in wear scar. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:17 am
Here are some suggestions. 1. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:38 pm
Arnold J decided (at 350 and 351): In short [yes, really, says Merpel], post-dated evidence may be relied on to confirm that the disclosure in the patent either does or does not make it plausible that the invention solves the technical problem. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:03 am
Arnold J decided (at 350 and 351): In short [yes, really, says Merpel], post-dated evidence may be relied on to confirm that the disclosure in the patent either does or does not make it plausible that the invention solves the technical problem. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:00 pm
But civil law does not share this concern. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:36 am
Tone at the Top does matter and it all starts there. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:27 pm
So the company operates at a lawyer to staff ratio of 8 to 1 as opposed to Big Law, which is typically at 1 to 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:19 pm
It's hard to tell, but the opinion does give another clue. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 6:55 am
FEEDBACK Father’s Day #1. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Keating (1984) 465 U.S. 1, 10-11 [holding that the California Suprem [read post]
