Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 781 - 800 of 4,617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm by Michael Geist
Lawful purpose (5) Paragraph (1)(a) does not apply if a technological protection measure is circumvented for any lawful purpose [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We view the present case as similar to Bilski.Bottom lineBecause claims 1-41 of the ’788 patent attempt to cap- ture unpatentable abstract subject matter, they are invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 5:31 pm
NRAP 41 Issuance of Remittitur; Stay of Remittitur (page 103 of the pdf) Most changes are stylistic. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 10:32 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
If this injustice has been committed . . . there does need to be some kind of remedy. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 1:56 pm by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
 In fact, according to a presentation provided at the February 1, 2012, e-Filing Authority Board Meeting, 41 counties now accept at least some filing electronically through the portal. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:29 am by Mack Sperling
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957) discarded by the Supreme Court in Iqbal and an earlier decision, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:44 am by emagraken
Rule 14-1(15) reads in part: (15)      The court may award costs . . . [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:18 am
Great Value peanut butter that does not have the "2111" code is not included in the recall. . [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:28 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
. : (1) For the purchase, sale or use of personal property or nonpersonal services which, in whole or in part, is necessary to the performance of any one or more contracts; or (2) Under which any portion of the contractor’s obligation under any one or more contracts is performed, undertaken or assumed. 41 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:33 am by Chris Mirasola
It is set to go into effect on June 1, 2017. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:27 am by Giles Peaker
On 1 December 2020, the tenants, assisted by Justice for Tenants, applied to have the landlord added as a respondent. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:04 am by Matthew Dresden
The Broncos filed an application to use “Orange Crush” on (1) shirts, caps, and sweatshirts (Class 25 goods) and (2) football-related education and entertainment services (Class 41 services). [read post]